Uncategorized

Ganeshotsav

Ganeshotsav

श्री गणेशाय नमः ॥

Ganpati and Ganeshotsav

The Bhadrapada Shulka Chaturthi of the Shalivaahana Shaka calendar is celebrated by Hindus as Ganesh Chaturthi. It usually coincides with the August-September period of the Gregorian Calendar.

Ganesh or Ganapati is the deity of auspicious beginnings. Don’t want to delve much into the details about Ganesha, but the curious reader can read this article from Wikipedia. Invoking Ganesha at the beginning of all things good is so much part of Hindu culture that the phrase ‘to do Shree Ganesha’ is used to denote a new beginning.

In Maharashtra, the period from Ganesh Chaturthi to Anant Chaturdashi an 11 days period is the period of celebration of the Ganapati Festival. The Ganapati festival also coincides with certain rituals and fasts meant for the deity Gouri. So it is a Gouri-Ganapati Festival. The day before Chaturthi, that is Tritiya is observed as Hartalika Vrat by the Hindu womenfolk. The Gauri festival (also known as Mahalaxmi in some parts of Maharashtra) consists of three days. So at a domestic level, it is a Gauri-Ganpati festival, and at the public level, it is Ganpati-Utsav.

The domestic annual rituals and festivities on Ganesh Chaturthi and days around it have been there even before the start of the public Utsav. The public celebration of Ganesh Utsav had started in Pune around 1893CE. Mr Bhausaheb Rangari was the founder of the first public Ganeshotsav Mandal. It was Lokmanya Tilak, a stellar figure in the national politics of India at that time, who gave the scale and support to this celebration. He saw it as an opportunity to unite masses for a common cause and use that opportunity to infuse nationalism, patriotism, and longing for Swarajya in the minds of common people. Ever since that period, it has become a significant public movement. Soon all the major towns and cities of Maharashtra and even some outside Maharashtra started following the tradition.

The gully-level public Ganeshotsav is an opportunity to showcase talent for kids and youth alike through Atharvashirsha Gayan, Sugam Gayan also by making idols and paintings. It is also taken as an opportunity for aspiring leaders to showcase their clout to the general public. The original public awareness campaign mode has changed in various forms of late. Post the economic liberalization of the 1990s the Ganpati festival too, like other festivals, has become commercialized as corporates see this as an opportunity to advertise and sell their products. 

About Miraj and Ganpati 

Miraj is a historical town in the south of Maharashtra with known historical references from the 10th Century CE. After passing on from Yadavs to the Delhi Sultanate of Khaljis it later went to the Bahamani Saltane, the Adilshahi, and the Mughals. Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj of Satara conquered the fortress of Miraj in 1739CE. Thus the Miraj Prant was annexed to the Maratha Empire. It was given as a fiefdom to Patwardhans from 1761CE by Peshwe Madhav Rao. It became a princely state under British protection from 1818CE to 1857CE and later a tributary princely state to the British crown till the Independence of India. It became free from the British yoke on the 15th of August 1947. In March 1948 when it was officially taken over by the Indian Government.

The ancestors of Patwardhans were from a small town called Kotawade in the Ratnagiri district of Maharashtra. Shree Harbhatt Patwardhan, father of noted Sardars Govind Hari and Ramchandra Hari was a noted Ganesha bhakta and Ganesha gave him Drishtanta and told his future generations will have a very bright future. He was a devotee of the Ganapatipule Devasthan. Hence Ganapatipule and Miraj have had a strong connection ever since. If you get the percentage of Hindus observing the Sankashti fast (the Chaturthi of the Vadya Paksha of Hindu months) the percentage will be significantly higher compared to other areas. Many people go to Ganpati Pule on Sankashti day from Miraj-Sangli area.

The Ganesh Temple (Talyavarcha Ganpati) and Ganesh Talav of Miraj were built circa 1798CE.


The Talyavarcha Ganpati Miraj

 Later in 1801 when the Miraj Jagir was split between Miraj and Sangli. Chintamanrao the first, the first chief of Sangli, had built a temple in Sanglikar Mala (A farm field just outside Miraj). When he planned and developed the Sangli town as his capital, he constructed the famous Ganapati Panchayatan Mandir of Sangli. Similarly, Tasgaon has its own Ganapati temple that is unique by its Gopuram. The Patwardhans developed small towns like Ganeshwadi and Haripur those also have Ganpati Temples.

A rupee coin struck at the Miraj Mint is called The ‘Ganapati-Pantapradhan’ rupee is a numismatic rarity. It has “श्री गणपती” struck on it on the observe side. It shows reverence of the local rulers to the lord Ganesh.

The first public Ganesh Festival celebration in Miraj was held in 1897CE at Watave Galli and the Buwacha Houd Ganpati established in 1901CE is the oldest continuously serving Ganesh Mandal of the town. There are around 350 Ganesh Mandals in Miraj. The first printed record of an immersion procession (Visarjan Miravnuk) is that of 1935. From 1979 there was a new introduction of Swagat Kaman (A decorated arch temporarily raised to welcome the procession) by Mr Ashok Khatavkar of Hindu Ekta Andolan later many other organizations added up their arches. The arch of Hindu Ekta used to be adored by decorative paintings made by noted fine artist Mr Sharad Apte. Likewise the Maratha Mahasangh arch used to be adorned with painting by Ugare arts. In the 21st century painstakingly handmade art has given way to digital photoshopping.

This 40-year-old tradition of Swagat Kaman was interrupted in 2019CE due to floods and in 2020 and 21 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Also, the Miraj Ganesh Visarjan Miravnuk is notable for its long hours. It lasts till the early next day morning and draws a huge crowd. 

Personal notes on Ganpati Festval

We observe the Ganpati Festival for five days at our home. The Visarjan day varies with family traditions and varies from 1 and a half-day to 11 days, ours is the 5th. One curious feature is we bring 2 Ganesh idols instead of 1. One of them undergoes Prana-pratishthapana with last year’s Darshani Ganapati and the second becomes the next year’s Darshani Ganapati. On the fifth day, the 2 with Prana-pratishthapana undergo visarjan while the remaining idol is kept for Darshan (hence called Darshani) for the next year. Our family Murtikars (idol-makers) are Kurundwadkar Joshi and the mould has been constant for many decades. The idols are brought home on the afternoon of Hartalika day and Pran-pratishthapana takes place on Chaturthi morning. The evening aarti is the time when the extended family gets together.

Even when I was away from home for studies, we used to have the Ganpati celebration in our hostel. When I was in Hyderabad, I realised that even outside Maharashtra Ganeshotsav is a big festival with a lot of following. The visit to Khairatabad Ganesh reminded me of the craze for Lalbagcha Raja when I was in Parel. Then there is the unique tradition of Balapur Ganesh Laddu. The apartment complex where I used to stay also celebrated 5 days Ganeshotsav. A notable difference I noted in Hyderabad Ganeshotsav was that the domestic Ganesh Murthis were earthen without much colour while the public pandal Murthis were richly coloured. The Marathi community Mandals also arrange cultural programmes and get-togethers.

The Ganesh festival is a fine opportunity to refreshen the tradition. It refreshes the rituals for the adults and teaches to the young kids. The aartis connect us to our great Sant Kavis of the past. While Sukhakarta Dukhaharta connects to Sant Ramdas, Trigunatmak Traimurti connects to someone born a century earlier: Sant Eknath. Usually, the last line of each aarti contains the name of its composer. The 5 unrelated stanzas sung together at the end of aartis as a Prarthana is also a very good example of the mixing of many traditions. The first is composed by Sant Namdev, the second is by Adi Shankaracharya, the third is part of Bhagwat Purana, the fourth again by Shankaracharya and the fifth a part of Kalisantarpana Upanishad. It has a fast pace. The ritual ends with Mantrapushpanjali, which is a slow recital, has its sources in the Vedic literature. After this, the teerthprasad are served.

The Ganeshotsav connects me to the uninterrupted traditions carried over many generations. The generations change but Ganpati remains the same. This festival is the common thread that continually keeps on connecting every next generation to a long string of devotion and worth inheriting and passing it on.

At the public level, it is a great opportunity to come together for the masses. It is a source of income for many people like the Murtikars (idol-makers), Mandap Decorators, Disc Jockeys, Flexboard Advertisers and many more. These days, due to social media, it gives a big opportunity for content makers too. Truly the deity of all vidyas and kalas (techniques and arts) gives livelihood to thousands of technicians and artisans. My only worry is that through this scaling up and increased emphasis on the optics, the Ganesh Bhakti core and traditional ethos should not be compromised. 

Wish you all a happy Ganeshotsav. May Ganesha bless all with wisdom and good health.

Posted by pathaksudh, 0 comments

Trichobezoar a case report

TRICHOBEZOAR OF THE STOMACH AND DUODENUM : A CASE REPORT

Dr N. R. Pathak, Pathak Hospital, Miraj, India.

Bezoars are foreign bodies which increase in size by nature of their ability to take substance after being ingested along these are hair, vegetable fibers, etc. Bezoars of the hair balls (Trichobezoars) are the most common.

The earliest case was reported- Baudament in 1779. DeBakey and Oschner (1938-39) made exhaustive review as regards history, incidence and modes of formation and symptoms and diagnosis and complications of Bezoars. Hyatt, Burke and Hollenbeck reported the total world known number 230 after adding one of theirs. In India Nazareth (1956) Shrivastav et al (1958), Sayyed et al (1960) have reported one case each. Malhotra and Khanchand (1957) reported two cases, Jalandarwalla and Shah (1963), Khan et al (1962)   reported one case each, some cases must have remained unreported. Of these cases reported by Trafford (1934) and Malhotra and Kanchand and Sayed et al were of intestinal obstruc­tion caused by Trichobezoars.

Trichobezoars are formed as ingested hair accumulated over years are churned into clumps with epithelial elements, mucus and food material in the stomach or intestine. The lump takes the shape of the stomach and tends to extend into Duodenum.  It appears dark green and is foul smelling due to fermented contents in the stomach.

Trichophagia is a personality disorder however, the Psycho-dynamics is not clearly known. Though Trichophagia may be from child­hood, the cases are detected in the age group of 15 to 30 years in over 801 of cases more being in females. The early course of the disease is symptomless but when the mass almost fills the stomach symptoms appear. Anorexia vague abdominal pain nausea and vomiting and loss of weight are complained by the patient. Diagnosis is likely to be missed if history of Trichophagia over many years and occa­sional passing of hair with stools are not elicited because there are no specific diagnostic signs of this disease. –

Barium opaque meal X-ray gives a complex patchy screen like appearance due to the Barium in between the meshes in the interlacing hair

Case report:

 A 20 year old Hindu boy attended the out-patient department of our hospital with complaints of 1) Nausea 2) vomiting after food, 3) Pain in abdomen and 4) weakness over more than two months

On examination he was a well-built boy except for lack of hair of the heard and very sparse moustaches. His voice was high pitched with a female tone. There was a large mass occupying the whole of the epigastrium. The mass extended from the left subcostal region to the right subcostal region and down to the umbilicus it could be moved up and down and from side to side and could be felt as a filled leather bag. History revealed occasional passage of hair; the patient detected this since he was 15 years old. Parents told that the boy had habit of trichotillomania and trichophagia since he was 2 years of age. The boy said he started eating more hair since 15th year of his age. He used to collect hair from the roadside near barber shops and used to chew them as hair balls and thence swallow. This gave him great pleasure as some get when chewing tobacco or beatle-nut.

Descending Pyelography revealed normal kidneys and ureters. X-ray after Barium Meal showed shadow of interlacing in the epigastric region.

His urine showed Albumin slight trace and W.B.C. + Stool report was normal.  Blood report was Hb 84% R.B.C. 4,260,000/cmm W.B.C.  15,200/cmm DLC Segments 57% stab-3%, lymphocytes 36%, mono 2%, eosino 2%, baso nil. He was operated on 19th July, 1962.

OPERATION NOTES.

Incision was taken in the median line from Xiphisternum to the umbilicus. On opening the abdomen the anterior wall of the stomach came in view.  The mass was found in the stomach and extended down to the second part of the duodenum.  Finger could be indented over the stomach wall.  A suitable site was chosen on the fundal side of the median line and towels were put and sutured over either side of the site of the incision.  Incision was taken from lesser curvature to the greater curvature. On opening the stomach a dark greenish yellow glistening mass with foul smell was found extending from the fundal dome of the stomach near diaphragm down to the duodenum. Attempts made to remove the mass manually failed due to slippery surface and broad fundal part of the mass abutting the stomach wall. The fermented fluid in the stomach was removed with an electric sucker. A big toothed forceps was used to pull the mass but this resulted in dismantling hair of the matted anterior surface. Therefore, a myoma screw was put at the fundal end and gradually the fundal end was pulled out ironing the edges of the stomach wound as we do in helping delivery of a foetal head, the assistant supporting the stomach wall to avoid irregular tear.  Once the fundal end was removed the mass came out easily including the duodenal end which was tapering and there was a gush of bile. This was aspirated. The fundal end was broadest with a beak like end near the cardiac opening. Thus the whole mass had taken the shape and size of the stomach pylorus and duodenum. Apparently it looked like a dead rodent. The actual measurement was 24.5″(63 cm) length and breadth 5”(12.75cm) and thickness 4”( 10.2 cm)

The colour was dark green glistening with mucus covering.

Mercurochrome was applied to the wound and the wound was closed as usual. The penicillin was instilled and the abdominal wall sutured layer by layer.

SUMMARY-

In the post operative period the boy developed hypostatic pneumonia, but responded to antibiotics and chemotherapy. Further recovery he was discharged on 30th July, 1962.  Since then he attends clinic as a follow up case. He is enjoying good health and is helping his father in business.

A case of Trichobezoar occupying the whole cavity of stomach, pylorus and first two parts of the Duodenum in a young boy of 20 is presented. As there was no free space to remove the mass with hand or forceps and attempts of applying toothed instruments showed tendency of spilling of fermented materials and hair pieces, a myoma screw was used with satisfaction without disturbing the meshwork of the mass.

References:

l) B. A. Sayed et Sahagal, Kothari,Trichobezoar causing Acute Intestinal Obstruction. Ind.Journ.Surg. Vol.XXII. 488-90 1960.

2) M. A. Khan Ramchandran and Verma. Trichobezoar, Ind. Journ. Surg.                                                                Vol. XXV.  901-13. Dec 1962.

3) P.M. Julundharwala and S.W. Shah.  Trichobezoar in the Jejunum.  Ind. Journ. Surg. Vol. XXV. 463-68. 1963.

4) M. O. Canter and R. P. Reynolds. Gastrointestinal Obstruction. Baltimore. The Williams and Wilkins Co. 1957 p.63

5) Rodney Maingot. Abdominal Operations. London. H. K. Lewis & Co. 1961. P.62.

Posted by pathaksudh, 0 comments
Me and my grandfather

Me and my grandfather

Me and my grandfather (A mid20th century surgeon from the point of view of an early 21st-century surgeon)

It is the 104th birth anniversary of my grandfather Dr Narsinha Ramchandra Pathak (Dr NRP). Born in Wai on 30th September in 1915 he went on to become a doctor, social worker, and politician.

On his birthday I wish to focus only on his life as a surgeon.

Most of the material at my hand is

  1. The first-hand narration by his brother late Mr B. R. Pathak, friends late Mr Yusufsaheb Sayyed and late Mr R. D. Parakhe.
  2. Pathak Hospital Library: there I got a few of his diaries and notes and a lot of books, and also some old patient records of our hospital.
  3. The operation theatre of Pathak Hospital
  4. Stories heard from my parents, aunts and old staff at our hospital who worked with Dr NRP

Becoming a doctor, a blessing in disguise

At 19 as a first-year science student of the Willingdon College Sangli he had dreamt of following the footsteps of his eldest brother Gangadhar ( Who was a mechanical engineering student and succumbed at an early age to Typhoid at 21) but destiny had some different plans. He was called on by his elder brother Balakrishna who was the personal secretary (later on he went on to become Inspector of Police of Miraj State) to the chief of Miraj Senior Shrimant Raje Sir Ganagadharrao Balasaheb to Mahabaleshwar (Every summer the chief with his entourage would be in Mahabaleshwar). The Rajesaheb ordered him to join the Miraj Medical School which was attached to the Mission Hospital run by the American Presbyterian Church ( Now it’s Wanless Hospital); because the Miraj chief wanted him to join the state-run hospital as a medical officer in future.

There was no question of saying no to the Rajesaheb and he joined the Miraj Medical School. He studied there from 1935 to 1940 and passed the Licentiate exam of the college of physicians and surgeons of Bombay (LCPS). The students from the territory not under direct British rule did not get easy admission to colleges under the British rule, those were ‘colleges’ attached to universities and offered MBBS ‘degree’.

Training of a young surgeon

In 1941 he had completed the internship and did a medical officership for 1 year. A diary from those days is available which reveals a lot about the scope of the internship. The interns of the Mission Hospital got to do a lot of hands-on work in contrast to the present day interns.

The 1941 stint as a medical officer at the Mission Hospital Miraj was the period when he was getting trained as a surgeon. He worked under 2 great surgeons of that time. Dr S. D. Arawattigi and Dr D. P. Gorde.

Dr S. D. Arawattigi was a skilled surgeon who was trained in Mission Hospital Miraj (1928 pass-out batch) and trained extensively by Dr Charles Vail MD FACS DO( in future Dr S. D. Arawattigi would name his private hospital as The Vail Memorial Hospital). Though he was the head of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, he looked after general surgery too. The amount of experience he had as a general surgeon reflects well through this paper on right hemicolectomy that is published in the Indian Medical Gazette in 1944.

Dr D. P. Gorde was trained at the Medical School of Poona (LCPS 1931 pass-out batch). He joined Mission Hospital in 1932 and was made the head of the Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology department in 1936 and in a few years he developed this department working devotedly. He had started his technique of keratoplasty and was a master at ENT operations too especially mastoidectomy. He happened to be the president of the Miraj Municipality in that year. This kept him busy often and gave a lot of opportunities to his young apprentice Dr NRP.

Dr Gorde went on to become the director of the Mission Hospital and his article on the history of the Mission hospital is quite informative.

This one year stint explains 2 things:

The interest of Dr NRP in ENT and ophthalmology and also training in obstetrics and general surgery.

1942: He went to Hukkeri Road ( Now Ghataprabha) and joined the Karnataka Health Institute as a medical officer and worked there for a year and a half. He was trained there by Dr N. S. Hardikar, and Dr G. R. Kokatnur both America trained surgeons who had established that institute. The institute then was a busy sanatorium for tuberculosis and treated all sorts of ailments as such.

In the 1940s the specialization into Medicine/surgery was thing restricted only to the metropolitan cities. In the mofussils and peripheral centre, a single medical man would be an institute in himself. He would be all a physician, surgeon and obstetrician as well. This is quite unimaginable in today’s medical scene in India where the students and patients are too much fixated with the idea of ‘super-speciality.

Ophthalmologist, trained well but sans a degree

In 1943 he went to the Grant Medical College, Bombay. There he got registration for Diploma in Ophthalmology. The work at the JJ Hospital and Grant Medical college made him a trained ophthalmologist now. He pursued the course till the exam and when he was about to appear for the exam he was called at once back to Miraj as he was a bonded candidate and the state of Miraj was in dire need of a medical officer. But his love for ophthalmology and cataract surgery never abated. From 1952 to 1968 every month of May he conducted cataract surgeries free of cost.

Back to Miraj

1945 He joined as the Assistant Medical Officer to the state-run Hospital of Miraj Senior. Dr K. G. Gosavi LCPS was the chief medical officer then. Dr K. G. Gosavi was impressed with him and gave him the liberty to operate independently. A year as the assistant medical officer of the Miraj Senior state taught him a lot in terms of practical knowledge. Soon his reputation as a capable physician and surgeon began to rise. He started his private setup in 1946 and which was named Pathak Hospital.

During 1946-47 he would assist his teachers Dr D. P. Gorde and Dr S. D. Arawattigi again when required. But soon he got too busy with his private practice. 

The busy surgeon who self-learnt and improved

By the late 1950s, his practice had risen a lot and he was a busy practitioner with his own 80 bedded indoor setup and used to carry around 5-7 operations daily. The operations included all variety including urology, general surgery and obstetrics.

In the 1950s he had started his blood bank of sorts. The records in the Pathak Hospital archives show multiple records of blood transfusions during that period. Also, he started developing a pathology collection with jarred and mounted specimens of all varieties. Unfortunately in his later days, due to too much occupation with politics, the upkeep of the specimens was neglected and most of them are lost now.

In the later 1950s and 60s, he travelled all over the world, visited prominent medical centres in all the countries he visited.

One of the high points of his surgical career was when he presented a case of stomach trichobezoar in the plenary session of a Medical Conference in Cairo in 1963. If we go through the details of that paper. It shows that he had adequate anaesthesia equipment to carry out major abdominal surgery. He employed routine laboratory methods and he was very meticulous about record keeping.

The OT equipment he left behind tells us about the range of operations he did

1. Complete cataract operation set, ophthalmoscope ( It was tested by his ophthalmologist granddaughter and found working)

2. Rigid bronchoscope and oesophagoscope

3. An hydraulic OT table purchased in 1950, is still in working condition

4. Hudson’s brace and set of burrs

5. Complete set of dentistry forceps

6. Bone nibblers, elevators, Gigli saw Handles, fracture table

7. Boyle’s apparatus Manufactured in 1958 still functioning

8. Electric sucker manufactured in 1957 still functioning.

9. Thoracotomy set: nobody would purchase unless one does these types of surgeries.

10. Desjardin’s forceps: definitely very specific for CBD stones

11. Adenoid snares

Training the staff

He was always a team man leading from the front. He rotated his employees in all departments so a single individual is capable to do most of the essential things and later on specialise in one, so that even if somebody is absent the work is not stopped.

Behind every successful man….

His mother Mrs Seetabai, always encouraged him. She had personally helped him conduct deliveries before he recruited and trained nurses. His elder brother Mr B. R. Pathak resigned from his job with Police and was a full-time administrator of all his ventures including the hospital, orphanage and also managed his election campaigns. His wife Mrs Vimalbai Pathak used to manage the store and housekeeping of the hospital and was helped by Mrs Indirabai wife of Mr B. R. Pathak. This invaluable family support kept him completely unbridled with other jobs and he could soak in the clinical job all the while during the first two decades of the practice. It was in the latter half of the 1960s that he entered politics formally. After entering politics, he lost a big chunk of his surgical practice and in 1978 when he quit active politics he had to start again from scratch. While busy in politics he had to rely on the surgical services of other surgeons and himself could provide hardly any time for surgery. It was his inspiration that made 4 of his 5 children take up medicine. The eldest daughter worked at a village as a general practitioner for 40 years now is retired, the second daughter is a gynaecologist and is involved in epidemiological research also. Both of them are GMC Miraj alumni and were trained in the same hospital as Dr NRP, the Wanless hospital. He was joined by his son and youngest daughter in 1980 both MS from LTMMC and BJMC respectively.

Impressions of a budding surgeon of his grandfather

I listened to many anecdotes of him as a child from his colleagues and the older staff of our hospital.

Though that OT table and Apparatus are on standby mode now and replaced with motorised adjustable tables and anaesthesia work station. And the big old 15 feet high operation ‘theatre’ with a viewing gallery is now modified to 2 smaller operation ‘rooms’ air-conditioned, now having a false ceiling 10ft high and with air filters, operating on the same table and the same place where my grandfather operated once is always a special feeling for me. The same table is being used by 3 successive generations of surgeons! (The Vail Memorial Hospital Miraj of Dr Arawattigi is the only other hospital where my grandfather, my father and myself have operated.)

Many of the needle holders or artery forceps my parents or I use today were used by Dr NRP once.

I was not fortunate enough to have enough of him, he passed away when I was barely four years old and I have barely a fading memory of him. But somehow I feel his presence through the underscores he made in the books of his library, through pages of his diaries and every time I scrub up for a case in the operating room of Pathak Hospital.

I joined the medical college in 1999 and joined Pathak Hospital in 2014 after 15 years. (After 15 years after joining Medical school Dr NRP had already established his own hospital). I restrict myself to only a particular subset of surgeries. (Dr NRP could do a hysterectomy to cataract everything because he was the only treatment option available for the patient). In the 21st century when you have a specialization, and subspecialization, people doing more and more of a restricted subset and having many people excelling in small subsets has certainly helped the medical field reach new horizons.

In contrast to this, my grandfather was a mid-20th century surgeon who worked at very high volume centres where there was a paucity of trained doctors but got the good fortune of learning with the masters. That exposed him to many cases at a young age and could progress. But it takes a lot of guts and a definitive skillset to progress without a structured programme in so many domains of surgery. One cannot just read and go out and do an operation. One has to be thorough with 

  1. The basic surgical skills.
  2. He was trained by high volume surgeons at high volume centres with exposure to all domains of surgery hence he could acquire these in a shorter period. 
  3. In-depth knowledge about the anatomy of the part being operated and what to do.
  4. The library is testimony to this process he underwent. It has multiple editions of Operative surgery text. Most of them are underscored with a red pencil.
  5. Knowing the possible complications that can arise and have a plan ready for each of them if they arise. This is not merely possessing knowledge-base but also requires the gifted skill of presence of mind. The use of a myoma screw to deliver a trichobezoar was ingenious.
  6. Have the equipment, trained staff to manage the above.
  7. Most important: The patient must have faith in you that you can do it successfully and consent ( this cannot be earned overnight)

It says volumes about the quality of training he got at his medical school and self-learning in his own capacity as well.

Conclusion

The take-homes I draw from my grandfather’s career as a surgeon especially the way he trained himself, are,

  1. Always be observant. Every small thing you do in daily practice might teach you something
  2. Reading keeps oneself updated, and as a clinician, it’s our obligation.
  3. The basic qualification is a must but not sufficient, importantly challenging and reinventing oneself keeps us on our toes.
  4.  Empathy and patient safety are always important.
  5.  Imbibe the extra-academic good qualities of your mentors too.
    1. The missionary zeal he imbibed in the Miraj Medical school helped him to establish Pathak Trust and Anathashram.
    2. The political activism of Dr D. P. Gorde, Dr Hardikar
  6.  Work in a cohesive team.

Posted by pathaksudh, 2 comments

ऑपरेशन थिएटर पलीकडचा सर्जन

शास्त्राक्रीयागाराचा चा लाल दिवा लागलेला आहे. बाहेर चिंताग्रस्त नातेवाईक बसलेले आहेत व अचानक दिवा बंद होतो, दार उघडते व हिरवा लांब झगा, टोपी व नाकपट्टी घातलेला इसम बाहेर येतो नाकपट्टी काढून उद्गारतो ‘काँग्रॅच्युलेशन्स द ऑपरेशन इस सक्सेसफुल’. हे झाले चित्रपटांतील वर्णन पण प्रत्यक्षात सर्जन फक्त शास्त्राक्रीयेपुरता मर्यादित नसून त्याआधी व त्यानंतर बऱ्याच काही गोष्टी त्याला कराव्या लागतात. त्यावर थोडासा प्रकाश टाकायचा प्रयत्न या लेखातून द्यावयाचा आहे.

एखाद्या व्यक्तीला त्या व्यक्तीच्या संमतीने जखम करून त्या व्यक्तीच्या भल्यासाठी एखाद्या अवयवाची रचना किंवा कार्य बदलणे किंवा अवयव काढणे किंवा जखमेमुळे झालेल्या परिणामांची परिमिती आटोक्यात ठेवणे याची क्रिया म्हणजे शस्त्रक्रिया. पण दुसऱ्याला जाणीवपूर्वक जखम करणे म्हणजे फार हिमतीचे काम! पण त्याबरोबर पूर्वाभ्यास व होणाऱ्या परिणामांची व्याप्ती आटोक्यात ठेवण्याची तारेवरची कसरत पण करावी लागते.

ही सर्व प्रक्रिया एका तक्त्यावर मांडून दाखवलेली आहे. तो तक्ता आपण नजरेखालून घालून पहा.

आपल्याला एक गोष्ट जाणवेल की या प्रक्रियेत त्याच गोष्टी परत परत कराव्या लागतात व काही महत्त्वाच्या क्षणी निर्णय घ्यावे लागतात.

एखादी गोष्ट पहिल्यांदा करताना फार उत्सुकता असते, पण दुसऱ्यांदा करताना त्याचे दोन प्रकार असतात.
१. दुसऱ्यांदा पहिल्या यशाने मूठभर मांस चढले असल्याने थोडा वाढीव उत्साह असतो किंवा चुकून पहिला प्रयत्न अनपेक्षित असेल तर दुसऱ्यांदा यश गावसण्यासाठी कंबर कसून केलेले प्रयत्न असतात. २. काही गोष्टी अशा असतात की त्या त्वरित फळ देत नाहीत पण तरीही त्या सारख्या सारख्या कराव्याच लागतात. अशा गोष्टी दुसऱ्या तिसऱ्या खेपेस कंटाळवाण्या वाटू शकतात. पण हा कंटाळा कटाक्षाने टाळणे गरजेचे असते. सर्जरी च्या क्षेत्रात असेच आहे ८० टक्के पेक्षा जास्त गोष्टी ह्या दुसऱ्या प्रकारात मोडतात.

प्रसंगानुरूप निर्णय घेण्यासाठी असामान्य बुद्धिमत्ता हवीच असे नाही पण साधारण पेक्षा अधिक निर्णयक्षमता व मनाची एकाग्रता मात्र नक्कीच लागते.

सर्जन पेशंट पाहतो म्हणजे नक्की काय?

सर्जन व पेशंट यांच्या संवादाची सुरवात हिस्टरी घेण्याने होते. हिस्टरी घेणे हा बराचसा भाग एखादी प्रश्नपत्रिका दिली व काय काय होते लिहा म्हणून सांगितले तरी होण्यासारखा असतो; पण त्यात हिस्टरी पेक्षा पलीकडचे बरेच काही असते. डॉक्टर व पेशंट मध्ये विश्वास निर्माण करण्यास हाच संवाद महत्वाचा असतो. पेशंटला पाहता क्षणी सर्जनच्या डोक्यात नेमका काय त्रास असेल याबद्दल चक्रे फिरू लागतात. हिस्टरी घेताना पेशंटला हा विश्वास देणे फार गरचेचे असते कि तुझ्या त्रासाची मला कल्पना घेणे फार गरजेचे आहे व पूर्णपणे कोणता किंतु परंतु न बाळगता तू माझयापुढे व्यक्त होऊ शकतो. बऱ्याच वेळा आपणास हा अनुभव आला असेल की फार प्रश्नांची सरबत्ती न करता डॉक्टरांनी एखाद दुसराच प्रश्न विचारला व तपासणी चालू केली. कारण अनुभवातून प्रत्येक डॉक्टर हे शिकत जात असतो की नेमकं काय विचारायचे. विचारण्यासारख्या सतराशे साठ गोष्टी असतात पण नेमक्या कोणत्या विचारायच्या ही पण एक अनुभवसिद्ध कला आहे. पेशंटची सांगितलेली प्रत्येक गोष्ट जाणून त्याचा किती संबंध व महत्त्व डायग्नोसिसशी लावणे यावर आमचा कस लागत असतो.

या नंतर पेशंटची शारीरिक तपासणी होते व आम्ही आमच्या मनात काही आडाखे बांधलेले असतात त्यांची सांगड ह्या तपासणीत काय निघाले याच्याशी घालून काही तात्पुरते निदान ( त्याला १,२ पर्यायी निदाने देखील असतात) ठरवले जाते.
आता पेशंटला पॅथॉलॉजी, +/- रेडियोलॉजी परीक्षा सुचवली जाते. गेल्या शतकात या दोन्ही बाबतीत विज्ञानाने फार मोठी क्रांती घडवून आणली आहे. पूर्वी जेव्हा सोनोग्राफी व रक्तपरीक्षा नव्हत्या तेव्हा बरीच ऑपरेशन्स केवळ पेशंटला काय आजार आहे हे कळण्यासाठी व्हावयाची आता सुदैवाने त्यांची संख्या कमी झालेली आहे. उलट सध्या आता अशी स्थिती आहे की विविध प्रकारच्या अनेक टेस्ट आपणास उपलब्ध आहेत.

सिटी स्कॅन व एम आर आय या दोन तपासण्या म्हणजे विज्ञानाची कमाल आहेत. त्यात बरीच माहिती ऑपरेशन आधी मिळते जसे कि समजा एक कॅन्सरची गाठ आहे तर, नेमकं आकारमान किती, अन्यत्र कुठे दुसरी गाठ आहे का, जी गाठ आहे तिचा एखादा महत्वाच्या अवयव/ किंवा रक्तवाहिनीशी किती जवळचा संपर्क आहे आणि अशी बरीच माहिती ऑपरेशन आधी मिळते त्यामुळे शस्त्रक्रियेचा नेमकेपणा सुधारतो.
या क्षणी रोगनिदान बव्हंशी केसेस मध्ये झालेले असते.

या टप्प्यापर्यंत बहुतेक वेळेस निदान लागलेले असते व पुढील नियोजनासाठी विचार चालू होतात. उपचार अनेकविध असतात त्यातले नेमके काय करायचे नुसती औषधे पुरेशी आहेत की ऑपरेशन पण गरजेचे आहे?
इंजेक्शने किंवा गोळ्या हा एक आणि ऑपरेशन हा दुसरा हे पूर्वी दोन ठोकळ प्रकार होते पण गेल्या काही वर्षांत ऑपरेशन न करता पण काही उपाय असतात जे रेडिओलॉजिस्ट सोनोग्राफी, अँजिओग्राफी किंवा सिटीस्कॅन च्या मदतीने केले जातात तयार झाले आहेत त्यांना इंटरव्हेन्शनल रेडिओलॉजी उपाय म्हणतात. ऑपरेशन म्हणजे चिरफाड हे झाले जुने समीकरण पण आता लॅपरोस्कोपी व एन्डोस्कोपी या तंत्रांनी कमीत कमी चिरफाड / काहीही चिरफाड न करता देखील शस्त्रक्रिया करता येते.

झालेले निदान पेशंटला सांगणे हे मोठे जिकीरीचे काम आहे. प्रत्येक पेशंटचा स्वाभाविक अधिकार आहे की त्याला काय झाले आहे याची पूर्ण माहिती असणे. पण जेंव्हा निदान एखाद्या असाध्य रोगाचे असते तेंव्हा नातेवाईकांचा यातील सहभाग फार महत्वाचा ठरतो.

सर्जरी करावी का नको ?: फायदा व जोखीम यांचे संतुलन

शत्रक्रिया करण्याचा निर्णय घेणे एका तराजूप्रमाणे आहे. एका पारड्यात शस्त्रक्रियेने होणारा फायदा असतो तर दुसऱ्या पारड्यात पेशंटला सर्जरीच्या जोखमीच विचार असतो आणि जोपर्यंत फायद्याचे पारडे खाली होत नाही तोपर्यंत सर्जरी सुचवली जात नाही.
यात दोन गोष्टी स्पष्ट होतायत. एक म्हणजे जोखीम फक्त शस्त्रक्रियेची नसून भुलेची पण असते त्यासाठी पेशंट भूलतज्ज्ञांना दाखवला जातो, तसेच निवडक बाबतीत फिजिशियन ना दाखवला जातो, ते पेशंट तपासतात आवश्यक अधिक चाचण्या करतात व जोखमीच अंदाज ठरतो.
दुसरी बऱ्याच वेळा पेशंट विचारतात तुम्ही याच निदानासाठी दुसर्या पेशंटला शस्त्रक्रिया केली होती व आम्हाला नाही म्हणताय याचे कारण हे असते की तुमच्या बाबतीत हे पारडे शास्त्रक्रीयेकडे पूर्ण झुकले नव्हते. याच वेळेला हा निर्णय हि होऊ शकतो की धोके अधिक असल्याने ज्या ठिकाणी अश्या गुंतागुंतीच्या शस्त्रक्रिया नियमीतपणे होतात किंवा त्यासाठी आवश्यक सोय आहे अश्या ठिकाणी पाठवणे.

डॉक्टर पेशंट सुसंवाद का महत्त्वाचा?

आता शस्त्रक्रिया ठरली आहे तर सगळ्यात महत्वाची गोष्ट म्हणजे संमतीपत्र. ज्यात पेशंट व पेशंटचा निकटवर्ती नातेवाईक यांना शास्त्रक्रियेविशयी व भूलेविषयी विस्तृतपणे सांगितले जाते, त्यातील संभाव्य धोके अवगत करून दिले जातात व त्यांच्या पूर्ण संमतीनेच सर्जरी होऊ शकते.
प्रत्यक्ष शस्त्रक्रिया या लेखाचा विषय नसला तरी नमूद करू इच्छितो की शस्त्रक्रिया एक गुंतागुंतीची कला आहे त्यात आम्ही पेशंटच्या सुरक्षेला सर्वोच्च प्राथमिकता देतो त्यासाठी आम्हाला (सर्जन,भूलतज्ञ,नर्सेस,तंत्रज्ञ व ईतर कामगार) एकसंघपणे काम करावे लागते. त्यासाठी जागतिक आरोग्य संघटनेने एक चेकलिस्ट बनवली असून त्याचा (प्रत्येक ठिकाणची स्वतःची एक पर्यायी पद्धत असते) वापर आम्ही करतो.
लाल दिवा बंद झाला आणि ऑपरेशन सक्सेसफुल म्हणण्याने काम संपत नाही तर येथून पुढे जोपर्यंत पेशंट डिस्चार्ज होत नाही तोपर्यंत रोज पेशंटला पाहणे त्याला काय त्रास होतोय, त्याचे शारीरिक तपासणीचे निष्कर्ष काय आहेत, काय तपासण्या कराव्या लागू शकतात याचे चक्र पुन्हा फिरू लागते. सुदैवाने सर्जरी व त्यातील जोखीम कमी होत चाललीये पण शून्य करणे सद्यमितीला अशक्य आहे. त्यामुळे जखमेतील इन्फेक्शन पासून न्युमोनिया पर्यंत अनेक गोष्टींचा विचार कायम करावा लागतो. क्वचित प्रसंगी रक्तातील गुठळी फुफ्फुसाच्या धमनीत अडकणे, हृदयविकाराचा झटका येणे असे जीवघेणे प्रसंगही उद्भवतात. परत शस्त्रक्रिया करण्याचा प्रसंग उद्भवतो किंवा वरिष्ठ संस्थेत पाठवावे लागू शकते. नवीन प्रतिजैविके निघाली आहेत तेवढेच चिवट जीवाणू होत आहेत त्यामुळे प्रतीजैविकेही विचारपूर्वक वापरावी लागतायत. या सर्व प्रक्रियेत डॉक्टर व पेशंट व त्यांचे नातेवाईक यांच्यातील सुसंवादाला अनन्यसाधारण महत्त्व आहे.

सारांश

  • शस्त्रक्रिया हे डॉक्टरांच्या भात्यातील गंभीरपणे हाताळण्याचे शस्त्र आहे.
  • ती एक गुंतागुंतीची प्रक्रिया आहे. १ नंतर २ नंतर ३ असा सरळसोट क्रम दर वेळेलाच असेल असे नाही बऱ्याच ठिकाणी दोन मार्ग असतात जेथे निर्णयक्षमता पणास लागते.
  • यात त्याच त्याच गोष्टी न थकता पुनःपुन्हा कराव्या लागतात म्हणून फार चिकाटी व मेहनत लागते
  • शस्त्रक्रिया हा एकपात्री प्रयोग नाही तर तो पूर्ण समूहाने एकत्र घडवलेला अविष्कार आहे. संघभावना व आपल्या संघातील सर्वाना योग्य वागणूक हे चांगल्या सर्जनचे लक्षण आहे.
  • वरिष्ठ संस्थेत इलाजासाठी पाठवणे म्हणजे जबाबदारी ढकलणे होत नाही त्यात पेशंटचे हित असते म्हणूनच हा निर्णय होतो.
  • पेशंट व पेशंटचे नातेवाईक पण या सर्व घडामोडींचे महत्वाचे घटक आहेत त्याची जबाबदारी असणे अपेक्षित आहे.

डॉ. सुधन्वा रा. पाठक
जठरांत्र व यकृत,स्वादुपिंड,पित्तसंस्था शल्यचिकित्सक
पाठक हॉस्पिटल
मिरज

Posted by pathaksudh, 2 comments

Diwali 2018

Wish you all a happy Diwali 2018

Posted by pathaksudh, 0 comments

A surgeon’s thinking : An algorithm

Surgery is craftsmanship involving the application of manual dexterity with purpose. It is a deliberate infliction of mechanical trauma and/or correction of effects of trauma to a consenting patient for the betterment of the patient.  This blog, I hope, will make you think a lot about how a surgeon (read me) thinks.

At the outset, I want to have a disclaimer that, this blog is not a medical recommendation and no therapeutic/diagnostic/preventive purpose is being served with it. The sole purpose of this blog is to put forth my personal views which obviously are not universally applicable.

If you have a look at the algorithm (see diagram) it involves a lot of decision making and repetition.

If one thinks that information collection is easily done with the help of standard checklists and questionnaires; it is true. It is also true that collection of objective data like pulse, BP, SPO2 and so on can be automated with multiparameter monitors. But collecting information is just one part of the algorithm. There are many places which require selection (where the paths break) . The first such place comes after history and physical examination. It takes a fair amount of training to winnow off the chaff from the kernel. I have noticed, and sure every surgeon must have about them, that as I progressed from a second year MBBS student to a Consultant over a period of a decade and half this ability of discretion was gradually amassed by repeated practice and it goes refining on every year that passes by.

Before committing a patient for surgery, it is important to establish a diagnosis. Fortunately the role of surgery as diagnostic modality has decreased over last half a century. Simultaneously the availability of quality diagnostic modalities has been a revolution. My generation of surgeons has the problem of plenty regarding imaging and investigations. It involves multiple specialists. And again, at this level, a precise and clear communication is required. If you can tell the radiologist/pathologist regarding what exactly you think clinically regarding the patient helps arriving at a precise diagnosis. This power of communication is acquired proportionate to the time a surgeon spent during residency and practice; discussing CT/ X ray and USG with his colleagues, fellow radiologists and bosses. Likewise basic tenets of pathology should be done and dusted if you want to communicate with your pathologist.

Revealing a diagnosis to the patient is not much of a problem, if it is not cancer or stigmatizing (a term I used with dislike) disease. If it is cancer or stigmatizing disease the close relatives have to be taken in the loop and might be a trained counselor has to be roped in.

Now that a diagnosis is established; the next question is whether an operation is needed? Or indeed, any treatment is needed?

The answer is rooted in the much cliched Latin phrase ‘Primum non nocere’ that means “first, do no harm.” All types of surgeries, however minor or major, have some complications. The complications can be minor to life threatening. We surgeons; have been hammered from our surgical infancy; that always assess the risk of surgery against the benefit of surgery and offer surgery only when benefit outweighs the risk unambiguously. This is easier to be typewritten than be practiced. It involves inferences drawn from medical peer reviewed literature (reading journals and learning from other’s experiences good or bad and to know standard complications and their rates). Inferences from your own past experience (We surgeons keep something called a log book and do surgical ‘audit’ both out of the scope of present blog). Doing this tells me that my proposed surgery is fairly safe (or dangerous but has to be done to save life). Also if the surgery is needed but I lack facility to carry it out at my centre it makes sense for me to refer the patient to a higher centre.

The next big question is “Is my patient safe for the surgery?” The answer to this, I get from the most trusted aide of the surgeon in the operation room, the anaesthetist. (A word of caution! They are called anaesthetists in the UK and anesthesiologists in the US. In India it is personal preference of the individual, some dislike being called an anaesthetist). He (more often a she) does a pre-anaesthesia check-up, orders some investigations for the patient safety and if required sometimes asks us to ‘cross-consult’ the patient to a physician/cardiologist.

Now the safety of the surgery towards the patient and the safety of the patient for the surgery is matched and a conclusion is drawn to post the patient for surgery.

Surgery is a very serious endeavour never to be taken lightly. The Listerian principles of asepsis are paramount for us. It involves a team effort of surgeon(s), anaesthetist(s), nurse(s) and technician(s). We use ‘WHO safety checklist’ to ensure we don’t miss a single important thing and make it safe for our patient. A lot many things like blood reservation, antibiotics, emergency drug tray, defibrillators readied are done as a part of preparedness for any untoward incidence.

Follow up after surgery is what truly sets us apart from mere craftsmen to thinking wise craftsmen. It is a loop followed every day by eliciting history, physical signs, and requisite investigations and modulating medical treatment accordingly to a point when the patient does not require any active treatment or is self-sufficient to self-medicate. At that point we discharge them with a reminder to follow-up. A minority of cases, do get some kind of complication for which the same loop is reiterated and if the treatment required is not available then the patient is referred appropriately.

Highlights:

  • Surgery is a serious endeavour.
  • Surgical decision making is a complex process and not a straight sequence always.
  • It involves
    • Points of discretion and selection of one option above another: A process demanding experience, education and adequate training.
    • Multiple reiterations of same things: A process that requires lot of devotion and dedication.
  • More often than not it is a craft practiced in a team along with other doctors and para-clinical staff.
  • Referral to a higher centre is neither the shrugging off of a responsibility nor a mark of incompetence; it is often a wise decision for benefit of the patient.

There is no shortcut for what it takes to make a surgeon (6 years of pre-residency scientific training. 3 years of blood and sweat in residency to get armed with surgical methods and skills and then many years of a continual process of maturation).

Dr Sudhanwa R. Pathak
MS, FAIS, FIAGES, DNB (GI surgery)
Miraj, India
10 Jan. 18

Algorithm of surgeon thinking

An algorithm to show how a surgeon thinks

Posted by pathaksudh, 8 comments